Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights even though respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. On the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided with the decision on the Supreme Court inside the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court 92. nine. The aforesaid exceptions are missing within the present case. In these types of circumstances, this petition is found for being not maintainable and is dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
The criminal jail appeal is dismissed.appeal being time barred the appellant in his appeal has not challenged(Criminal Jail Appeal )
twelve. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons owning their character earlier mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are for being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is usually a condition precedent for appointment to some Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to a Government service could be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to try and do away with the candidature of your petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: 15-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
3. I have heard the figured out counsel for the parties and have gone through the record of this case with their equipped assistance.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, Additionally it is a nicely-set up proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.
(Interview by email, with Ahmad Rafay Alam, a leading environmental lawyer and activist in Pakistan, August 28th, 2015). Furthermore, the ruling placed a notice and comment restriction on government organizations in regards to projects that could most likely pose a public risk. This case can be noteworthy, “because it laid down the foundations of all potential public interest litigation brought before courts for environmental protection.” To cite only one example, following this case, the Supreme Court, citing the Zia decision, found within the Salt Miners Case (decided on 12th July, 1994) that the right to have water free from pollution and contamination is a right to life itself.
The court cannot listen to the transfer order challenge because it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders preserving in view that among the respondents has retired from service as pointed out because of the counsel for that respondent university. twelve. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order as to costs. Read more
On June 16, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of your boy by a guardian advertisement litem, against DCFS, the social worker, and also the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf of the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian ad litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for the dismissal based on absolute immunity, since they were all acting in their Employment with DCFS.
Knowledge with the accused is a matter for being inferred click here from the circumstances, for it being a state of mind, is very difficult for being proved otherwise.”
1. Judicial Independence: The court emphasized the importance of judicial independence and also the separation of powers.
147 . Const. P. 479/2019 (D.B.) Waheed Akhtar V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi The petition regarding the upgraded post and fork out fixation aren't entertainable for the reasons that this kind of matters are typically handled by administrative or service tribunals, and also the legal grounds for this petition are insufficient as such this petition is dismissed, which consists of disputed claims and counterclaims on the topic post, therefore this court is just not in the position to dilate upon these kinds of disputes in constitutional jurisdiction. Read more
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case regulation previously rendered on similar cases.